Certification, Forests, Logging, Rainforests, Tropical Forests Vietnam plans to certify as sustainable some 5,000 square kilometers (1,930 square miles) of production forests in the country and boost timber export value to $8 billion by 2020.Nearly a quarter of the country’s forests are managed by smallholders, whose subsistence lifestyle often compels them to harvest their timber too young to be used for furniture or as quality wood products.An initiative by WWF looks set to change this by training smallholders in sustainable farming methods under FSC standards, which is hoped to also boost their income over the long term.Local wood processors and exporters are also pushing for higher domestic supply as they look for a more viable alternative to costly imported timber. HO CHI MINH CITY – In a bid to address the history of poor management that has ravaged its forests and the quality of its timber, Vietnam is embracing a more sustainable approach to its smallholder-driven forestry sector.The Vietnamese government has set targeted goals to certify 5,000 square kilometers (1,930 square miles) of the country’s 67,000 square kilometers (25,870 square miles) of plantation forest and to raise its timber export value to at least $8 billion by 2020, according to Vietnam News.Since the majority of the country’s plantation land is divided into small family plots, focusing on improving smallholders’ ability to produce quality timber could be paramount to meeting these goals.As a key player in the global timber trade, Vietnam exports manufactured wood products to over 120 countries worldwide. But quality remains low: only 20 percent of the country’s domestic output is of high enough quality to be used for furniture exports, according to the NGO Forest Trends.Earlier this year, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) told Voice of Vietnam that it expects timber exports to reach $7.5 billion by the end of 2017. There is a growing emphasis on sustainability across all state departments, with steady progression in the National Action Program on REDD+ and the recent conclusion of Vietnam’s VPA negotiations for involvement in Europe’s FLEGT trade program. (FLEGT, or Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade, is an EU action plan established in 2003 as a way of promoting trade in legally produced timber and banning illegal wood from entering the EU market.)This drive for higher-quality timber and better forestry practices is mirrored in Vietnam’s private sector. As international demand for FSC-certified timber grows, the country’s wood processors and exporters are pushing for higher domestic supply, the key to which could lie with Vietnam’s smallholders.A member of a local FSC-trained harvesting team at work in Phu Loc district, in Vietnam’s Thua Thien-Hue province. Photo by James Morgan/WWF with permission.Nearly a quarter of Vietnam’s forests are currently managed by smallholders, producing 20 million cubic meters of low-value timber each year, according to Forest Trends. Since most are living hand to mouth and dependent on short harvests, up to 85 percent of their timber is harvested young and is too small in diameter to be used for furniture or quality wood products, according to a Forest Trends report for FLEGT.Each smallholder plot is typically managed by a family and is about 3 to 4 hectares (7.4 to 9.9 acres) in size.“Most smallholders have only a few hectares of land,” said Huynh Van Hanh, the vice chairman of the Handicrafts and Wood Association. “At around the five-year mark they cut [their trees] because they have to get money to keep their family alive.”Small farmers trained for export supply chainSmallholders currently lack the capacity to farm high-quality wood, but a WWF initiative to train them in FSC-standard timber production could change their situation.WWF’s Sustainable Bamboo-Acacia-Rattan Project functions as part of its National Strategy on Sustainable Production, addressing targets for conservation and biodiversity protection in Vietnam’s Central Annamites region.“We … support the smallholders here to get more income [and manage] sustainable acacia plantations to reduce the pressure on the natural forest,” said Nguyen Vu, project manager for the initiative.First implemented in the central province of Quang Tri and later in Thua Thien-Hue and Quang Nam, the initiative is tailored to each region and developed in close collaboration with local government bodies.“We work with them to [establish] any parallels between the targets of our project and the objectives of the province,” Vu said. “We base [our targets] on their strategic plan … to ensure sustainability after the project finishes.”The program begins with a seminar on its economic, environmental and social implications. According to Vu, only a certain proportion of the province’s farmers will opt to register for training at this point, while others prefer to watch their neighbors’ experiences first. Future members are then certified through the smallholders, rather than through WWF.“The [smallholder] association will provide an application form, guide them through it and do a quick assessment of their land,” Vu said.Auditors review a smallholder plantation at the preliminary stages of certification during a 2016 FSC audit in Phong Son district, Thua Thien-Hue province. Photo by Loc Vu Trung/WWF with permission.As per FSC standards, training is based on forest management and chain of custody assessments for each smallholder. “We also run a training needs assessment to get a better understanding of what their training and capacity building needs [are],” said Le Thien Duc, forest program coordinator for WWF. “Then we will see a gap, develop a plan and conduct the training.”Once the smallholders are ready, they undergo an FSC audit for certification, which lasts for five years. Within this period, they will be audited every year to ensure continued compliance with FSC standards.A work in progressIn parallel to this, WWF sets up management structures for the smallholders to coordinate. Each province is organized into a clear hierarchy with an executive board at the provincial level, sub-associations at a village level, and individual members. They function as a legally recognized entity and all representatives are elected through a vote among the smallholders, held every five years.But a key flaw in this system is that local authorities are still heavily involved.“At this stage our key partner is the Forestry Protection Department,” WWF’s Vu said. “They staff the executive board at the provincial level and farmers run the sub-associations.”This prevents smallholders from being totally independent and is a short-term solution since the government board members have their own tasks within their department and cannot commit to the project indefinitely.“We want the smallholders to be more independent,” Vu said. “But at this stage they don’t have the capacity and skill to manage the whole certification group.”WWF plans to address this once the smallholders have more experience in working as part of the plantation association model.According to Phuc Xuan To, a policy analyst for Forest Trends, there is also a need for clearer legal guidelines around the model.An acacia plantation belonging to TTH-FOSDA members in Ben Van village, Phu Loc district, Thua Thien-Hue province. Photo by Loc Vu Trung/WWF with permission.“Most upland households, they have no idea what [an economic contract] is! They may for example cut down the tree, sell to someone else instead of selling to the company,” he said. “Or the company may run away from the contract if the [market] price of timber drops. Legal framework for regulating that kind of economic transaction is not strong enough yet.”Contending with short-term income demandsDespite the clear long-term financial benefit of the program, short-term needs are a pressing issue for smallholders who are used to harvesting every few years. (*Editor’s note: Mongabay was unable to speak with any smallholders for this article because of the complex bureaucracy around arranging interviews and the Vietnamese government’s policy to send an official escort with a journalist for potential in-person interviews).According to WWF, all training costs are covered by WWF sources, but cost of living is still the farmers’ responsibility. Many plantation owners sustain themselves with simple labor, animal husbandry or farming agricultural crops.Others reserve a small part of their plantation for shorter-term, non-FSC harvests.“Many households have several forest areas, for example 4 hectares but divided into three different areas,” WWF’s Vu said. “Joining our program is voluntary. We tell them they don’t need to join all of their forest; they can save 1 or 2 hectares for wood chips to cover their short-term income.”In some instances, farmers may also be able to receive assistance from the smallholder association they belong to.“We set up a kind of member fee,” said Thien Duc, the forest program coordinator. “Then they use that money for association initiatives and to support members if they come into financial difficulty.”These membership fees are renegotiated every year. According Vu, there are three main fees that the Quang Tri smallholders are required to pay: an annual fee, a land fee per hectare of plantation, and a harvest fee of 7 percent of the overall difference in price that farmers receive for their FSC-certified wood versus that for non-certified wood.Since there is such a high level of risk involved in investing in a long-term acacia harvest, particularly in central Vietnam where storms and natural disasters such as landslides and floods are common, most banks do not want to offer loans to small-scale farmers.“The plantation requires quite a long-term investment [and high risk],” said Forest Trends’ Phuc Quan. “No commercial bank is prepared to provide that kind of loan.”Instead, WWF tries to encourage the companies that contract smallholders to offer them credit or an advance for their timber. Both Quang Tri and Thua Thien-Hue’s smallholder associations have contracts with Scansia Pacific, a supplier to Swedish furniture giant IKEA. One Forest Trends report found that this company provides loans of up to about $176 per hectare per year for household plantations with at least six years growth, which are repaid when the wood is ready to be bought.Model set to evolveThe conditions for these loans and smallholder-company collaborations depend completely on negotiations between the two parties.Acacia is processed into parts for garden furniture at Minh An Co., a factory that processes 100 percent FSC timber and works exclusively with Scansia Pacific, a supplier to IKEA. Photo by James Morgan/WWF with permission.“We build up the cooperation and relationship between the buyer and the seller,” Vu said. “This way, we shorten the value chain and remove any unneeded middle men. They negotiate without us; we just bring people together.”Because of the high demand for domestic FSC-certified timber among Vietnam’s processors, smallholders are able to negotiate 15 to 20 percent more for their FSC timber than they can for non-certified wood, according to WWF. Without smallholder arrangements, many manufacturers have to rely on expensive imports, and although the transacted costs of working with small plantations are also high, it is still more viable to buy from smallholders than to rely on imports, according to FSC Vietnam.One such Vietnamese timber processor, Thanh Hoa Corporation, used to rely on imports before working with small farmers.“There is more and more competition to buy FSC-certified wood here,” said company chairman Thien. “Before, we imported acacia from Malaysia and the Solomon Islands, but now there is not enough to feed our demand.”For him, the future of Vietnam’s FSC-standard timber industry lies in merging its now scattered plantation land together.“Smallholders cannot easily use plantation techniques; with small land you cannot do anything,” he said. “You must have big land and invest the money, the technology, the time, to get more product.”Although certified smallholders do work as one body, their land remains scattered into household plots. This could change, however, as WWF’s model develops. According to Vu, the project is improved on each time it is reapplied to a new province.“In Quang Tri we took two-and-a-half to three years to prepare the smallholders for FSC auditing because they were the first in Southeast Asia,” he said. “But last year we applied the program to [Thua Thien-]Hue … and it took one to one-and-a-half [years].”With this consistent approach to development, the smallholder model seems set to change and grow as it is applied further in Vietnam. The concept of linking small farmers with manufacturers is itself a clear asset to Vietnam’s efforts for sustainability; the question just remains how it will be used.Banner image: Smallholder Ho Da The at work in his FSC-certified acacia plantation in Phu Loc district, Thua Thien Hue. Photo by James Morgan/WWF with permission.Zoe Osborne is a freelance journalist based in Vietnam. You can find her at www.zoeosborne.com.FEEDBACK: Use this form to send a message to the author of this post. If you want to post a public comment, you can do that at the bottom of the page. Article published by Genevieve Belmaker Popular in the CommunitySponsoredSponsoredOrangutan found tortured and decapitated prompts Indonesia probeEMGIES17 Jan, 2018We will never know the full extent of what this poor Orangutan went through before he died, the same must be done to this evil perpetrator(s) they don’t deserve the air that they breathe this has truly upset me and I wonder for the future for these wonderful creatures. So called ‘Mankind’ has a lot to answer for we are the only ones ruining this world I prefer animals to humans any day of the week.What makes community ecotourism succeed? In Madagascar, location, location, locationScissors1dOther countries should also learn and try to incorporateWhy you should care about the current wave of mass extinctions (commentary)Processor1 DecAfter all, there is no infinite anything in the whole galaxy!Infinite stupidity, right here on earth.The wildlife trade threatens people and animals alike (commentary)Anchor3dUnfortunately I feel The Chinese have no compassion for any living animal. They are a cruel country that as we knowneatbeverything that moves and do not humanily kill these poor animals and insects. They have no health and safety on their markets and they then contract these diseases. Maybe its karma maybe they should look at the way they live and stop using animals for all there so called remedies. DisgustingConservationists welcome China’s wildlife trade banThobolo27 JanChina has consistently been the worlds worst, “ Face of Evil “ in regards our planets flora and fauna survival. In some ways, this is nature trying to fight back. This ban is great, but the rest of the world just cannot allow it to be temporary, because history has demonstrated that once this coronavirus passes, they will in all likelihood, simply revert to been the planets worst Ecco Terrorists. Let’s simply not allow this to happen! How and why they have been able to degrade this planets iconic species, rape the planets rivers, oceans and forests, with apparent impunity, is just mind boggling! Please no more.Probing rural poachers in Africa: Why do they poach?Carrot3dOne day I feel like animals will be more scarce, and I agree with one of my friends, they said that poaching will take over the world, but I also hope notUpset about Amazon fires last year? Focus on deforestation this year (commentary)Bullhorn4dLies and more leisSponsoredSponsoredCoke is again the biggest culprit behind plastic waste in the PhilippinesGrapes7 NovOnce again the article blames companies for the actions of individuals. It is individuals that buy these products, it is individuals that dispose of them improperly. If we want to change it, we have to change, not just create bad guys to blame.Brazilian response to Bolsonaro policies and Amazon fires growsCar4 SepThank you for this excellent report. I feel overwhelmed by the ecocidal intent of the Bolsonaro government in the name of ‘developing’ their ‘God-given’ resources.U.S. allocates first of $30M in grants for forest conservation in SumatraPlanet4dcarrot hella thick ;)Melting Arctic sea ice may be altering winds, weather at equator: studyleftylarry30 JanThe Arctic sea ice seems to be recovering this winter as per the last 10-12 years, good news.Malaysia has the world’s highest deforestation rate, reveals Google forest mapBone27 Sep, 2018Who you’re trying to fool with selective data revelation?You can’t hide the truth if you show historical deforestation for all countries, especially in Europe from 1800s to this day. WorldBank has a good wholesome data on this.Mass tree planting along India’s Cauvery River has scientists worriedSurendra Nekkanti23 JanHi Mongabay. Good effort trying to be objective in this article. I would like to give a constructive feedback which could help in clearing things up.1. It is mentioned that planting trees in village common lands will have negative affects socially and ecologically. There is no need to even have to agree or disagree with it, because, you also mentioned the fact that Cauvery Calling aims to plant trees only in the private lands of the farmers. So, plantation in the common lands doesn’t come into the picture.2.I don’t see that the ecologists are totally against this project, but just they they have some concerns, mainly in terms of what species of trees will be planted. And because there was no direct communication between the ecologists and Isha Foundation, it was not possible for them to address the concerns. As you seem to have spoken with an Isha spokesperson, if you could connect the concerned parties, it would be great, because I see that the ecologists are genuinely interested in making sure things are done the right way.May we all come together and make things happen.Rare Amazon bush dogs caught on camera in BoliviaCarrot1 Feba very good iniciative to be fallowed by the ranchers all overSponsored
Malaysia Cup PKNP handed disadvantage ahead of second leg tie Ooi Kin Fai Last updated 2 years ago 15:00 22/9/2017 FacebookTwitterRedditcopy Comments(0) Goal Malaysia Cup PKNP v FELDA United FELDA United PKNP PKNP will not get to play their Malaysia Cup second leg at home after MBI stands firm on no back-to-back matches. PKNP FC didn’t get the rub of the green when it was decided that only one team can play their quarterfinal second leg match at home in Perak Stadium. Perak The Bos Gaurus got the nod and will have their home leg actually be played at home on Sunday. Football Malaysia Limited Liability Partnership (FMLLP) announced the changes in the two fixtures after intervention from Ipoh’s City Council (MBI). Editors’ Picks ‘I’m getting better’ – Can Man Utd flop Fred save his Old Trafford career? Why Barcelona god Messi will never be worshipped in the same way in Argentina Lyon treble & England heartbreak: The full story behind Lucy Bronze’s dramatic 2019 Liverpool v Man City is now the league’s biggest rivalry and the bitterness is growing After much work put in to repair and improve the state of the pitch at Perak Stadium over the past two months, MBI were vehement in their decision not to allow back-to-back matches to be held at the stadium.Initial schedule put the PKNP versus Felda United match on Saturday with the Perak versus Pahang match on Sunday, both at the same ground.However, in a similar situation, the stadium was used for back-to-back matches earlier in the season in the FA Cup. Back then, PKNP played the first day on 10th March 2017 against Kuantan FA before Perak took on Kedah the following day on 11th March 2017.The change meant that PKNP will now play their home second leg in an away ground more than 200km down south. Shah Alam Stadium was chosen as the alternative venue and it is a decision that will surely disappoint Abu Bakar Fadzim, having said previously that the team is looking forward to playing at home again.PKNP hold a 3-1 lead against Felda after a Shahrel Fikri hat trick at Tun Abdul Razak Stadium has more than given the plucky Premier League a chance to reach the semi-final stage of the competition.